Yiannis Nicolaos Lymperis @ on
I come from Greece. My name is John Lymperis I have a patent (the ultimate seismic system) I am looking to find scientific partners to do simulations and experiments. Are you interested; Read a little about this seismic system I am looking forward t
THE ULTIMATE CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM FOR EARTHQUAKE The earthquakes in recent years around the world have put in first priority the major social and economic issue of the seismic behavior and overall seismic protection of structures against earthquakes . Various methods have been developed to optimize the response of structures to seismic action An important part of developments for seismic strengthening of buildings, does not agree with modern architectural needs , which require as much as possible free plans ( unbalanced construction) and reduction of structural elements of the building . Also , the architectural needs differentiate the surface coverage of the building on each floor . The problems arising from the application of these architectures claims is to create 1) ultimate limit state at soft storey, 2 ) a change in the symmetry of the columns , 3 ) stronger strain construction , because it creates a concentration effect of action on columns 4) asymmetric structures is observed the torsional effect on floors . Today a) We plan ductile structures, but we also need the torsional stiffness to stop the torsion of asymmetric floors. b) Design methods yield (or else plastic zones) which are default locations of failure to be the first ultimate-yield in a powerful earthquake. This seismic design planning today is very useful but insufficient current architectural needs. In my quest to design the ultimate seismic system, I built a mechanism and design a method with high earthquake resistance because it improves the indicators of 1 ) the ductile How we can improve the ductility of columns of ductile structural system Reply . Separating the ductile structural system of the rigid structural system, by placing them between seismic joint, partition isometric seismic loads on the vertical elements of the two structural systems. What will happen if we do not distinguish these two structural systems ; When the earthquake started , the ductile columns bend because they have great elasticity . Large rigid columns, do not bend because they have stiffness. The result is … all of the earthquake loads to be received from the rigid elements.
2 ) Of the plastic zones. Question. How to improve the indicators of plastic zones; Reply . Separating the ductile structural system of the rigid structural system, by placing them between seismic joint. The seismic joint works like the plastic zone for the yield load of the earthquake. (Without Fail) 3) The torsional stiffness of asymmetric structures ; Question. How to improve the indicators of torsional stiffness of asymmetric structures; Reply. By placing more than one rigid structural systems (with the interposition of a seismic joint between at selected points) inside the asymmetric ductile static system Even the pretension creates anyway stiffness. 4 ) Improves resistance of the column relative to the shear force
5) Increases active behaviour of columns 6 ) Improves awry tension Question. 4) How do I improve the strength of the column relative to the shear force and shear force base; 5) How do I increase the active behaviour of columns; 6) How to Improve the oblique tension? Reply . We know from the bibliography that pretension itself is very positive, because it improves the trajectories of oblique tension On the other hand we have another good … reduced cracking because we apply compression stress which increases the active behaviour of columns;, as well as increases the stiffness of the structure , which reduces the deflection causing failure.
7) Glider displacement node of higher level, and the deflection of the rigid structure Question. How glider displacement node of higher level, and the deflection of the rigid structure? Reply. Introducing a new vertical resistance to the roof (stops the roof to get up) coming from the ground, through the mechanism of the invention. Even the pretension creates anyway stiffness, and the deflection of the rigid structure.
8) lower the natural frequency of the soil and construction; Question. How do we lower the natural frequency of the soil and construction; Reply. Because the compression stress in the cross section of the columns, lowers the natural frequency And because Introducing a new vertical resistance to the roof, it stop the natural frequency, because seismic damping applied to the width of the wave of the earthquake.
9) It helps avoid the concentration effect of action at soft storey, 10) In the pretension there is no problem of relevance ( consistency ) of concrete and steel . Question.
- How it helps to avoid concentration load intensity in soft floor;
10) How eliminates the problem of relevance of concrete and steel; Reply. In a prestressed well, there are is not baffles and this gives the opportunity to work as a body to control the curve of the ductile system and keeps control over the vertical axis before break.
In prestressing there is no problem with the relevance as present in the inert reinforcing concrete because the clamped structure clamped at both ends of the mechanism of the invention, out of the concrete. The deflection on the vertical axis of the ductile system due to the difference spectrum of multiple plates, which tend to give the vertical axis in the form of S
If we take a candle and break it with your hands in the center will observe that the candle breaks, but the wick stays in the candle.
But if you break the candle at its ends, will not do the same. The interface of the two materials is less at the edges, whereby smaller and the reaction than is the reaction of the other party.
The result is the wick of the candle at the ends to lose its relevance and be pulled out of the candle The same phenomenon is observed in the columns of the ground floor. We always see when the columns fail, the steel pulled out of the concrete, shaped curve, but never cut. The pretension applied the mechanism of the invention does not exhibit said the problem of relevance, simply because there is no link between concrete and tendon, because it passes freely through the concrete. The tendon anchors applied to both ends of the mechanism out of the concrete.
11) Ensures stronger foundation. Question. How did the invention provides a stronger foundation; Reply. The clamping mechanism of the invention stops the building to go up and down. as does the screw with hanger bolts. 12) The invention automatically improves the traction of steel which is observed in prestressed steel Reply. The hydraulic system automatically improves – pulling steel – observer in pretension. The hydraulic system automatically improves anchorage of the anchor to the ground and maintains the structure anchored to the ground, even in many circles loads
13) ensures damping decrement of seismic loads , which leads to reduced resonant response Reply. The forces that cause energy called damping forces and always oppose the motion of the system running oscillation. The design method that I follow dampening 1) horizontally at the base 2) at the level of (bulkheads) plates and the shaft. (Seismic joint) 3) on the roof, mounted the hydraulic system. And all this without eliminating the ductility of the bearing, which in itself and is a damping seismic energy.
These two structural systems can work together, or we can only use the rigid component alone to build rigid structures
a) design method b) design method Brief description of the invention The principal object of the hydraulic tie rod for construction projects of the present invention as well as of the method for constructing building structures utilizing the hydraulic tie rod of the present invention is to minimise the aforesaid problems associated with the safety of construction structures in the event of natural phenomena such as earthquakes, hurricanes and very high lateral winds. According to the present invention, this can be achieved by a continuous pre-stressing (pulling) of both the building structure towards the ground and of the ground towards the structure, making these two parts one body like a sandwich. Said pre-stressing is applied by means of the mechanism of the hydraulic tie rod for construction projects. Said mechanism comprises a steel cable crossing freely in the centre the structure’s vertical support elements and also the length of a drilling beneath them. Said steel cable’s lower end is tied to an anchor-type mechanism that is embedded into the walls of the drilling to prevent it from being uplifted. Said steel cable’s top end is tied to a hydraulic pulling mechanism, exerting a continuous uplifting force. The pulling force applied to the steel cable by means of the hydraulic mechanism and the reaction to such pulling from the fixed anchor at the other end of it generate the desired prestressing in the construction project. This prestressing ensures to the vertical elements of 1) greater stiffness 2) resistance to shear force 3) greater resistance to horizontal load 4) less deformation 5) strong foundation. b) Better methods yield-or else plastic zones In the video we see two static systems….one inside the other. The first prestressed rigid structure has 1) greater stiffness 2) resistance to shear force 3) greater resistance to horizontal load 4) less deformation 5) strong foundation,…to receive large shocks from ductile static carrier and stop the deformation of ductile static carrier. At the height of the plates created seismic joint for two reasons 1)The seismic joint gradually grows on the upper floors to avoid transferring loads to the lower floors, derived from the primary impact plate – elevator shaft See the plan http://s5.postimg.org/rllh3dhzb/002.jpg 2)For to separate the vertical rigid elements of the ductile elements for better cooperation between these two structural systems
The seismic joint gives freedom to all the free movement of ductile construction which itself is a mechanism amortization of seismic energy. Amortization of seismic energy ensures the invention of the video .. to 1) The hydraulic system on the roof. 2) The seismic joint 3) The horizontal seismic isolation These two structural systems can work together as we see in the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPaNZcHBKRI or we can only use the rigid structural system itself to build rigid structures, as indicated by the links https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6og4VWFcGA http://postimg.org/image/poaeawzrj/
1) Model response frame structure with absorption of energy at the base , on the roof , and bulkheads of slabs .
Is this the model construction http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPaNZcHBKRI
2 ) Plan model asymmetric multi-storey building with energy absorption in the base , the roof , and bulkheads of slabs .
Is this model http://postimage.org/image/tg1lzxv05/
3 ) Model response with energy absorption in the loft
4 ) Model response to absorption of energy in existing structures . One of the many design models wall O.S transfected or transfected steel structures http://postimage.org/image/k51vo9k15/ As shown in Figure 1 http://postimg.org/image/rbudm6oqr/ When the column is at stationary state, the static actions are balanced with the opposing forces of soil As shown in Figure 3 http://postimg.org/image/rbudm6oqr/ The oscillation of the building changes the vertical axis of the column See the slope change P that is observed at the regional sides. As shown in Figure 2 http://postimg.org/image/rbudm6oqr/ The combination of static actions, Σ with the changes of vertical axis of the column, create the torsional moment P of the node. How the invention stops the existence torsional moment P of the node. As shown in Figure 4 http://postimg.org/image/rbudm6oqr/ Clamped column can not be moved up and down because it is clamped with the ground, with the mechanism of the invention. As shown in Figure 5 http://postimg.org/image/rbudm6oqr/ The Clamped column with the ground, stops the oscillation of the vertical axis of the column, because the hydraulic mechanism of the invention applies an opposite stress in the rise of the roof Δ ( derived from the clamped anchor in soil ) and another inverted stress in the base Ε As shown in Figure 6 http://postimg.org/image/rbudm6oqr/ The Clamped column with the ground, transfer lateral load of inertia at the vertical axis of the column, as shear force. This does not happen with the seismic design of today. Τhe seismic design of today drives the shear forces at the small sections of the columns and beams. What design is the best? 1) To plan the seismic design of today drives the shear forces at the small sections of the columns and beams. or 2) To plan the seismic design of today drives the shear forces at the small sections of the columns and beams, plus…The Clamped column with the ground, transfer lateral load of inertia at the vertical axis of the column, as shear force? Also … prestressed construction … a) reduces the eigenfrequency construction / soil b) Increases active behaviour of columns c) Increases resistance to shear e) improves the oblique tension All seismic systems that exist today have the idea of the horizontal seismic isolation. The seismic system I propose is very different from other seismic systems. a) It is the first sentence Awards I suggesting the clamped structure to the ground. b) It is the first time worldwide that I suggest applying a reaction at the highest point of the roof, to stop the deformation of construction. c) It is the first time worldwide that I suggest a system able to deflection earthquake loadings, to stronger cross-section able to receive the shear stress. If you know a static model which will be able to stand on this seismic base….. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6og4VWFcGA please tell me to do the experiment designing frames, or asymmetrical structures, the solution is…. 1) to separate the flexible columns, from the rigid columns 2) amortization method of seismic energy in the vertical and horizontal axis of the frame. 3) nodes to move freely round the rigid column 2) Giannhs Lymperis • PCT Opinion http://postimage.org/image/32vfj43z8/ http://postimage.org/image/2g4sfacsk/ http://postimage.org/image/332ou0y04/ http://postimage.org/image/33322bpyc/
From what the examiner says that I have something patentably new and useful. Improved anchoring means comprising expansion anchors in combination with hydraulic tensioning means to keep the building tightly tethered to the ground. This would also be good for hurricane country, like the US Gulf Coast.
in Greece I have the patent. I had filed for international patent in pct passed Research Report (A) Filing in America at the patent office. I have not gotten a patent in america yet …. expected Patent publication in America. http://postimg.org/image/8ox3ft743/ more I went to a university in Greece. this one http://users.civil.ntua.gr/papadrakakis/ and here http://www.itsak.gr/en I have the first preliminary results of applied research simulationIs in Greek language. It’s very good results. The Institute of Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research and Technical Institute has a different opinion. told me that …. there is not a program in whole world that simulates vertical prestressing. They told me that I need to do ( experiments ) seismic testing on some construction models, because it is not possible to simulate. The patent is under investigation by me and I have discovered much about the patent. By design method that I suggest, https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i…m6_iuOU6fsUXY2 you have the opportunity to design a flexible structure. Rigid vertical elements The main reason I designed the seismic joint (rubber mounted air gap between the baffle plates and the shaft) are to separate the flexible columns of rigid columns. With this method, we have a frame construction which is flexible, and in it, a rigid colomn, which is independent of load bearing because it has a seismic joint The rigid components to take the main role assigned to them, and is to controlling the deformation of the bearing. plasticity a flexible node (the one in seismic joint) deletes the usefulness of plasticity
MY NEW EXPERIMENT
this video shows the medium accelerations .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ubLKyyO2q0 Even greater acceleration https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOyoEWpvsjM Even greater speed than the other two times . Look towards the end of the video that gets the beam base ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6og4VWFcGA
In this video got the beam broke the bearing of a bar that makes the transmission reciprocating motion, and I had after 3.5 minutes that nodded to stop. The model did not suffer the slightest , the base dissipated . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUH5OBd64vc
no cracking … not suffered the slightest . After the experiment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBJi…ature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNfB…ature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnsC…ature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XH-…ature=youtu.be
THIRD EXPERIMENT WITHOUT THE SYSTEM SEISMOSTOP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux8TzWYvuQ0
After the third experiment (Control structure model and base) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTBr0CtjRoM
If the system I have is strong or not, by anchoring structures will be discussed later with another different experiment . Consider if the foundation of the project with the ground and the roof is better seismic design of the existing earthquake regulations . Imagine that fat in this experiment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6og4VWFcGA there is only the construction and soil. The construction in our model starts from the raft and above, and the ground of the iron based seismic and down. I think that in the depths of a drilling anchors if the anchor is impossible for construction to pick up all this ground. Since I consider the seismic base as ground very powerful clamping , in our experiment, think that soil is the seismic base, bearings , the W of the iron beam, the beams O.S which rests the foundation, and whatever else may be. The model ground ( seismic base) join the tendons . During the oscillation of the model tendons reacted to rising roof and raised the iron seismic base. The iron seismic base in turn raised his bearings which rests , bearings found resistance at the anode were in F the iron beam , and this is well anchored to the beam from the O.S lifted upwards. All this is a result of chain torque model.
Removing the screws from the bottom of the base changed the whole scene . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux8TzWYvuQ0
The model not having the screws to hold it began to wobble dangerously . The bearings were no longer in the upward tendency of the beam Π, because the model of oscillated only on the basis of seismic iron . Instead of upward trends bearings took percussive strokes of the oscillation of raft on the seismic base. Bearings are dyed and not withstand the impact. For this and broke . The model does not fight happened almost anything, because it was very powerful nodes ( horizontal and vertical ) and because it was not possible to test the accelerations tested the previous experiment with the bolts , because we would have complete reversal . The conclusion I make myself is that if the model was more multi storey would have even more sway than that of two floors …. The first conclusion is that this earthquake is very much necessary for the fine buildings to stop the oscillation from the air, and the earthquake . If this model O.S experiment was made of bricks ( bricks ) without columns, imagine for yourself what would happen if there were no screws and rods . Conclusion necessary that the earthquake in the continuous construction. This is my opinion …. I would be happy to know and yours . Basically what makes this invention is that it makes far more powerful rigid large vertical elements , giving them greater resistance to both cutting as well as the lateral loads . There are many designs for installation , which depend on the architectural design needs .